Otis Woodruff b. 1795

出典: Rodovid JA

出来事

1795 誕生: Machias (Maine), otis woodruff, father of horatio - born 1795 farmer

結婚: ♀ Sally B. Meserve (Mersevoy) [Mersevoy]

1829 子供の誕生: Machiasport (Maine), ♀ Sarah Woodruff [Woodruff] b. 1829

1838 子供の誕生: Machiasport (Maine), ♂ Horatio E. Woodruff [Woodruff] b. 1838 d. 19 7月 1907

1841 子供の誕生: ♂ Aaron Woodruff [Woodruff] b. 1841

4 11月 1849 EVEN: sailing of brig agate with levi farnsworth on board for the gold fields of the pacific

15 4月 1850 EVEN: San Francisco, An illustrated history of san joaquin county 1890 arrival in SF from Maine carrying J.L. Gilman

4 11月 1850 EVEN: Machias (Maine), Alameda County California Biographies 1883 and on the 4th of November, 1850, accompanied by his wife and sister, he sailed in the brig Agate bound for San Francisco. During the voyage of six months his health seemed quite restored, he having gained

備考

Ship Registers and Enrollments of the Custom District of Machias, Maine

Agate, brig of Machias. Built at Machiasport 1848 by James Stuart, master carpenter. 194 [and]

88/95 tons; 95 ft. 5 in. x 24 ft. 2 in. x 9 ft. 5 in. One deck, two masts, square stern, a billethead.

Registered, No. 6, Nov 28, 1848 at Machias. Owners: Albert Pilsbury, Benjamin F. Bucknel, Machias; Ezra S. Sprague, Otis Woodruff, Machiasport; Jeremiah Bradbury, Calais; John Moreen, Whitneyville; Robert Foster, Josiah M. Talbot, Erastus Woodbury, Boston, Mass. Master: Albert Pilsbury.

Registered No. 7, Nov. 30, 1848 at Machias. Owners: Albert Pilsbury, Benjamin F. Bucknel, Machias; Otis Woodruff, Machiasport; Jeremiah Bradbury, Calais; John Moreen, Whitneyville; Robert Foster, Josiah M. Talbot, Erastus Woodbury, Boston, Mass.; Aaron K. Thompson, New York City. Master: Ezra S. Sprague.

Enrolled, No. 23, July 26, 1849 at Machias. Owners: Albert Pilsbury, 3/8, Martha E. Bucknel, 1/8, Machias; Otis Woodruff, 1/8, Machiasport; John Moreen, 1/8 Whitneyville; heirs of Jeremiah Bradbury, 1/8, Calais; Aaron K. Thompson, 1/8 New York City. Master: Edward Winchester. Previously enrolled (temporary) Mar. 8, 1849 at New York City.

Registered No. 10, Oct. 27, 1849 at Machias. Owners: Albert Pilsbury, ½, Martha E. Bucknel, 1/8, Machias; Otis Woodruff, 1/8, Machiasport; John Moreen, 1/8, Whitneyville; heirs of Jeremiah Bradbury, 1/8, Calais. Master: Thomas Johnson.

出典

1. ↑ http://books.google.com/books?id=xdsgysln66MC&pg=PA2276&lpg=PA2276&dq=woodruff+machias+maine&source=web&ots=FUfonM_0mQ&sig=kM4aJ3wt9qeOOqoHSWy7XhWgwZI&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=5&ct=result#PPA2276,M1 -
2. ↑ http://books.google.com/books?id=p_47AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA264&dq=otis+woodruff&ei=XHcmSa70JJPYlQSr08imBg#PPA264,M1 -
3. ↑ http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=EX4gAAAAIBAJ&sjid=DGgFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2374%2C15112 -
4. ↑ http://books.google.com/books?id=Qs62AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA264&img=1&zoom=3&hl=en&sig=ACfU3U1wAJZYw522aHhahCSi2fW0imfrRw&ci=145%2C585%2C769%2C885&edge=0 - BRIG AGATE : BRADBURY v JOHNSON 41 MAINE 582 REGISTER or VESSEL is NOT EVIDENCE OF TITLE even against the person named in it as owner without extra neons proof that it was made with his authority or assent and even then is not conclusive and it is not evidence in his favor at all being nothing more than his declaration ASSUMPSIT to recover a part of the earnings of a certain vessel The case appears from the opinion B Bradbury for the plaintiffs Granger for the defendant By Court EIOB J To establish their title to the brig the plaintiffs put into the case a copy of the register issued at Machias October 27 1849 by which it appeared that Albert Pillsbury owned one half and Martha E Bucknell Otis Woodruff John Mareen and the legal representatives of Jeremiah Bradbury one eighth each Also a bill of sale dated Juno 25 1851 of one eighth part of the brig from Martha E Bucknell to the defendant It was admitted that Bion Bradbury was administrator on the estate of Jeremiah Bradbury Plaintiffs also introduced a writ in favor of Albert Pillsbury Benjamin F Bucknell and others against this defendant dated January 15 1852 and the defendant introduced the judgment recovered against him in that action To entitle the plaintiffs to maintain the action they must prove title in themselves For this purpose the copy of the register is relied upon The registry acts are considered as institutions purely local and municipal for purposes of public policy The register therefore is not of itself evidence ol

祖父母から孫まで。